Generative Adversarial Pipelines for Driving Data Anomaly Detection with Microservices and Containerization in AI-Driven Cybersecure Systems

Main Article Content

Julia Szymańska Kacper Kamiński

Abstract

The increasing complexity of autonomous and connected vehicle ecosystems necessitates advanced mechanisms for detecting anomalies in driving data to ensure operational safety and security. This paper presents a generative adversarial network (GAN)-based pipeline designed for real-time anomaly detection in heterogeneous vehicular data streams, including sensor readings, vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communications, and telemetry logs. Leveraging microservices and containerization, the framework ensures modularity, scalability, and efficient deployment across edge and cloud environments. AI-driven analytics enable proactive identification of abnormal patterns, while integrated cybersecurity mechanisms provide continuous threat monitoring and secure data handling. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed pipeline achieves high detection accuracy, low latency, and robustness under diverse driving scenarios. The study highlights the potential of combining GANs, microservices, and AI-enhanced cybersecurity to create resilient and reliable autonomous driving systems.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Generative Adversarial Pipelines for Driving Data Anomaly Detection with Microservices and Containerization in AI-Driven Cybersecure Systems. (2023). International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering, Technology and Management (IJRPETM), 6(6), 9628-9631. https://doi.org/10.15662/IJRPETM.2023.0606001

References

1. Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3), 1–58.

2. Sugumar, R. (2016). An effective encryption algorithm for multi-keyword-based top-K retrieval on cloud data. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 9 (48):1-5.

3. Gandhi, S. T. (2023). RAG-Driven Cybersecurity Intelligence: Leveraging Semantic Search for Improved Threat Detection. International Journal of Research and Applied Innovations, 6(3), 8889-8897.

4. Ahmed, M., Mahmood, A. N., & Hu, J. (2016). A survey of network anomaly detection techniques. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 60, 19–31.

5. Sakurada, M., & Yairi, T. (2014). Anomaly detection using autoencoders with nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Proceedings of the MLSDA, 4–11.

6. Manda, P. (2023). A Comprehensive Guide to Migrating Oracle Databases to the Cloud: Ensuring Minimal Downtime, Maximizing Performance, and Overcoming Common Challenges. International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering, Technology and Management (IJRPETM), 6(3), 8201-8209.

7. Appani, C. (2022). Graph Neural Networks for Dynamic Malware Behaviour Analysis and Classification in Advanced Persistent Threats (APT). International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security.

8. Navandar, P. (2022). Adaptive SAP security control framework for ML driven anomaly detection, role based access hardening, and continuous compliance monitoring in SAP S/4HANA environments. International Journal of Engineering & Extended Technologies Research (IJEETR), 4(3), 4939–4952. https://doi.org/10.15662/IJEETR.2022.0403005

9. Kavuri, S. (2022). Large Language Model (LLM)-Based Automation for Software Test Script Generation. Computer Fraud & Security, 17-28.

10. Parasa, M. (2023). Integrating SAP SuccessFactors LMS with external digital learning ecosystems: Toward a unified enterprise knowledge framework. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 9(7), 514–534.

11. Subramanyam, S. P. (2023). Cloud infrastructure automation and role-based access governance in Azure Kubernetes services. International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering, Technology and Management, 6(2), 8392–8400.

12. Namdeo, A., Atulkar, A., & Porwal, R. K. (2022, August). Investigation of Two-Stage Epicyclic Gearbox for an Automobile for Energy Regeneration. In Biennial International Conference on Future Learning Aspects of Mechanical Engineering (pp. 363-376). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

13. Panyala, V. R. (2021). Innovative reliability engineering solutions for internet-scale cloud consumer platforms. International Journal of Computer Technology and Electronics Communication, 4(1), 1–13.

14. Narayanan, S. (2023). Operationalizing Artificial Intelligence Security in the Cloud: A Practical Integration framework for Enterprise Risk Management. International Journal of Future Innovative Science and Technology (IJFIST), 6(3), 10619.

15. Boddupally, H. L. (2021). A telemetry-centric approach to identifying recurrent defect structures in software systems. Available at SSRN 6270478.

16. Polamreddy, V. R. (2022). Architecting Hybrid Synchronization Models to Enable Safe International Platform Transitions. International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering, Technology and Management (IJRPETM), 5(1), 6216-6229.

17. Gollapudi R. Backup integrity and recovery readiness assessment for high-availability databases. Computer Fraud and Security. 2024;23.

18. Vayyasi, N. K. (2023). Retail fraud analytics using generative intelligence and Java cloud frameworks. International Journal of Science, Research and Technology, 6(4), 10324-10337.

19. Kotla, M. R. T. (2023). Autonomous enterprise integration: The future of self-healing data and API ecosystems. International Journal of Research and Applied Innovations (IJRAI), 6(3), 5968–5971.

20. Arulraj AM, Sugumar, R., Estimating social distance in public places for COVID-19 protocol using region CNN, Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 30(1), pp.414-424, April 2023.

21. Zhou, C., & Paffenroth, R. C. (2017). Anomaly detection with robust deep autoencoders. KDD, 665–674.

22. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., et al. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. NeurIPS, 27, 2672–2680.

23. Schlegl, T., Seeböck, P., Waldstein, S. M., et al. (2017). AnoGAN: Deep anomaly detection using generative adversarial networks. Medical Image Analysis, 54, 30–44.

24. Akcay, S., Atapour-Abarghouei, A., & Breckon, T. P. (2018). GANomaly: Semi-supervised anomaly detection via adversarial training. Asian Conference on Computer Vision.

25. Sangannagari, S. R. (2023). Smart Roofing Decisions: An AI-Based Recommender System Integrated into RoofNav. International Journal of Humanities and Information Technology, 5(02), 8-16.

26. Cherukuri, Bangar Raju. "Microservices and containerization: Accelerating web development cycles." (2020).

27. Nguyen, T., Chen, Z., & Han, S. (2021). GAN-based synthetic sensor data generation for autonomous vehicle training. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 6(3), 477–487.

28. Zhang, X., Wu, H., & Wang, L. (2020). GAN-based anomaly detection for automotive CAN bus. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 69(12), 15243–15254.

29. Sugumar, Rajendran (2019). Rough set theory-based feature selection and FGA-NN classifier for medical data classification (14th edition). Int. J. Business Intelligence and Data Mining 14 (3):322-358.

30. Badmus, A., & Adebayo, M. (2020). Compliance-Aware Devops for Generative AI: Integrating Legal Risk Management, Data Controls, and Model Governance to Mitigate Deepfake and Data Privacy Risks in Synthetic Media Deployment.

31. Arjovsky, M., Chintala, S., & Bottou, L. (2017). Wasserstein GAN. ICML.

32. Liu, Y., Zhang, H., & Chen, Y. (2022). Cloud-based scalable anomaly detection for connected vehicles. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(12), 9985–9995.