Cyber Forensics Tools and Techniques for Effective Digital Crime Detection and Investigation
Main Article Content
Abstract
Digital crime continues to escalate in scope and sophistication, necessitating advanced cyber forensic tools and methodologies to effectively detect, investigate, and prosecute offenders. Cyber forensics encompasses the systematic collection, preservation, analysis, and reporting of digital evidence from computers, mobile devices, networks, and cloud infrastructures. This paper explores the range of forensic tools and techniques used to counteract cybercrime, emphasizing their utility in various investigative scenarios. We investigate file and disk forensic tools (e.g., EnCase, FTK), network and packet analysis solutions (e.g., Wireshark, Network Miner), and memory forensics platforms (e.g., Volatility). Additionally, we examine methods for log analysis, timeline reconstruction, artifact recovery, and steganography detection. The integration of automated analysis and machine learning within cyber forensics is also examined for efficiency gains. Through literature review and empirical testing on simulated digital crime scenarios, we evaluate each tool’s performance in evidence extraction, accuracy, and usability. Key findings reveal that memory forensics significantly enhances detection of advanced persistent threats and in-memory malware; timeline reconstruction tools improve contextual analysis; and hybrid toolkits that integrate multiple sources expedite investigation workflows. The paper outlines a systematic workflow for cyber forensic investigations and discusses advantages (e.g., improved reliability, automation) and limitations (e.g., complexity, legal constraints) of contemporary tools. Results highlight the importance of tool interoperability, training, and robust legal compliance. In conclusion, cyber forensic tools and methodologies are vital in the fight against digital crime. Continued innovation in automation, cross-platform capabilities, and legal frameworks will enhance investigative effectiveness. Future work should emphasize forensic readiness in cloud environments, integration with AI for anomaly detection, and standardized procedures for multi-jurisdictional investigations.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
1. Casey, E. (2011). Digital Evidence and Computer Crime: Forensic Science, Computers and the Internet. 3rd ed.
Academic Press.
2. Casey, E. (2018). Handbook of Digital Forensics and Investigation. Academic Press.
3. Carrier, B. (2005). File System Forensic Analysis. Addison-Wesley.
4. Garfinkel, S. (2010). Digital Forensics with Open Source Tools. Elsevier.
5. Ligh, M. H., Adair, S., Hartstein, B., & Richard, M. (2014). Malware Analyst’s Cookbook and DVD: Tools and
Techniques for Fighting Malicious Code. Wiley.
6. Moore, D., & Dean, C. (2005). Internet Forensics. Addison-Wesley.
7. Roussev, V., & Richard, M. (2004). Breaking the Performance Wall: The Case for Distributed Digital Forensics.
Digital Investigation, 1(3), pp. 118–125.
8. Araújo, A. (2017). Network Forensics: Tools and Techniques. Packt Publishing.
9. Livadas, C., Jiang, H., Chow, R., Keromytis, A. D., & Stolfo, S. J. (2006). Detection of anomalous system-call
arguments using symbolic execution and static analysis. 14th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications
Security.
10.Combs, G. (2020). Wireshark User’s Guide. Available from https://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked.