SAP Beyond Uptime: Engineering Intelligent AMS with High Availability & DR through Pacemaker Automation

Main Article Content

Anuradha Karnam

Abstract

For two decades, the enterprise reliability discipline has myopically prioritized the statistical artifact of "five nines" availability, treating uptime as the ultimate proxy for system health while neglecting the structural fragility of the underlying automation. This theoretical stagnation has resulted in a "Manual Intervention Paradox," wherein increasingly complex SAP architectures rely on brittle shell scripts and human intuition for critical failover decisions, reducing "Intelligent Application Management Services" (AMS) to little more than reactive ticket clustering. Addressing this methodological crisis, this study proposes a "Unified Control Theory" that reclaims the physicist’s definition of AM simultaneous sensing and manipulating by integrating the formal verification standards of medical device engineering into the SAP Pacemaker stack. Through the development of a custom State Verification Engine (SVE) grounded in timed-automata models, we subject a distributed SAP HANA landscape to stochastic fault injection, contrasting the behaviour of standard resource agents against this formally verified logic. Results indicate that while the proposed architecture introduces a requisite latency penalty, it successfully prevents fatal "split-brain" scenarios in complex failure modes were legacy automation invariably corrupted data. Ultimately, this work redefines Intelligent AMS from a bureaucratic support function into a rigorous control plane, demonstrating that the future of enterprise resilience lies not in the pursuit of raw speed, but in the engineering of automated survival through epistemological certainty.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SAP Beyond Uptime: Engineering Intelligent AMS with High Availability & DR through Pacemaker Automation. (2023). International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering, Technology and Management (IJRPETM), 6(5), 9351-9361. https://doi.org/10.15662/IJRPETM.2023.0605011

References

1. Ai, W., Patel, N., & Roop, P. (2016). Requirements-centric closed-loop validation of implantable cardiac devices. 2016 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), 1148–1153. 10.3850/9783981537079_0190

2. Jiang, Z., Connolly, A. T., & Mangharam, R. (2010). Using the Virtual Heart Model to Validate the Mode-Switch Pacemaker Operation. 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 3991–3994. 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5626262

3. Mani, R. (2022). Enhancing SAP HANA Resilience and Performance on RHEL using Pacemaker: A Strategic Approach to Migration Optimization and Dual-Function Infrastructure Design. International Journal of Computational and Theoretical Engineering Concepts, 5(6), 33–39. 10.15680/ijctece.2022.0506007

4. Madathala, H. (2019). SAP Failover Setup for HANA Database 1.0 SP12 and SAP ASCS/ERS using Pacemaker Tool. TURCOMAT, 10(1), 350–362. 10.61841/turcomat.v10i1.14805

5. Carreon, N., Gilbreath, A., & Lysecky, R. L. (2020). Statistical Time-based Intrusion Detection in Embedded Systems. 2020 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), 1279–1284. 10.23919/DATE48585.2020.9116369

6. Umeno, S., & Lynch, N. (2010). Automated Formal Verification of the DHCP Failover Protocol Using Timeout Order Abstraction. 2010 17th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, 20–29. 10.1109/ICECCS.2010.14

7. Mohanty, S., & Kougianos, E. (2019). iVAMS 2.0: Machine-Learning-Metamodel-Integrated Intelligent Verilog-AMS for Fast and Accurate Mixed-Signal Design Optimization. [Unspecified Venue], 1907.01526. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.01526.pdf

8. Xu, B., & Hu, Y. (2019). The comparison of pacemaker’s automatic threshold control function and adaptability analysis. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 252(4), 042073. 10.1088/1755-1315/252/4/042073

9. Mohanty, S., & Kougianos, E. (2019). iVAMS 1.0: Polynomial-Metamodel-Integrated Intelligent Verilog-AMS for Fast, Accurate Mixed-Signal Design Optimization. [Unspecified Venue], 1905.12812. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.12812.pdf

10. Beyer, B., Jones, C., Petoff, J., & Murphy, N. (2016). Site Reliability Engineering: How Google Runs Production Systems. [Unspecified Book/Venue]. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/66262b28bd902d760f5b4e866ee137da39e8cd79

11. Hecker, B., Chavassieux, M., Laflutte, M., Beguin, E., Lagasse, L., & Oudinot, J. (2004). VHDL-AMS library development for pacemaker applications. Proceedings of the conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe, 16–17. 10.1109/DATE.2004.1269269

12. An, G., Yoon, J., Sohn, J., Hong, J., Hwang, D., & Yoo, S. (2022). Automatically Identifying Shared Root Causes of Test Breakages in SAP HANA. Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2235–2246. 10.1145/3510457.3513051

13. Abdulhameed, A. A., AlKindy, B., & Al-Mahdawi, B. (2022). Smart System Modeling and Simulation design of Hemodialysis Machine by SysML with SystemC-AMS. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences Technology (JEAST), 4(2), 1–13. 10.47363/jeast/2022(4)153

14. Kim, H. (2021). How modular structure determines operational resilience of power grids. New Journal of Physics, 23(6), 063004. 10.1088/1367-2630/ac0096

15. Poudel, S., Dubey, A., & Bose, A. (2019). Risk-Based Probabilistic Quantification of Power Distribution System Operational Resilience. IEEE Systems Journal, 14(2), 2686–2696. 10.1109/JSYST.2019.2940939

16. Harvey, N., & Hippo, S. (2020). Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) and the Art of Service Level Objectives (SLOs). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6514105b72277a730eb0a2afaad3c71807e4ff0c

17. Jambigi, N., Bach, T., Schabernack, F., & Felderer, M. (2022). Automatic Error Classification and Root Cause Determination while Replaying Recorded Workload Data at SAP HANA. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST), 281–292. 10.48550/arXiv.2205.08029

18. Bach, T., Andrzejak, A., Seo, C., Bierstedt, C., Lemke, C., Ritter, D., ... Lehner, W. (2022). Testing Very Large Database Management Systems: The Case of SAP HANA. Datenbank-Spektrum, 22(4), 221–235. 10.1007/s13222-022-00426-x

19. Lichte, D., Torres, F. S., & Engler, E. (2022). Framework for Operational Resilience Management of Critical Infrastructures and Organizations. Infrastructures, 7(5), 70. 10.3390/infrastructures7050070

20. Weiss, P., Elsabbahy, S., Weichslgartner, A., & Steinhorst, S. (2021). Worst-Case Failover Timing Analysis of Distributed Fail-Operational Automotive Applications. 2021 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), 1787–1792. 10.23919/DATE51398.2021.9473950