Cloud-Native Testing Frameworks for Explainable Generative AI in Healthcare and Financial Systems
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive software-testing framework tailored for explainable generative artificial intelligence (XGenAI) systems deployed in cloud-based credit risk and threat modeling environments. As XGenAI components (conditional VAEs, tabular GANs, and hybrid generative–discriminative pipelines) become central to decisioning and security analytics, they introduce new failure modes that traditional ML testing approaches do not fully cover: synthetic-data fidelity issues, latent-space counterfactual implausibility, explanation fidelity drift, and adversarial probing of model endpoints. We propose a layered testing architecture combining unit, integration, system, and continuous monitoring tests specifically designed for XGenAI artifacts and their surrounding infrastructure. The framework contains (1) deterministic test harnesses for data preprocessing and feature pipelines (schema contracts, statistical invariants, lineage checks); (2) generative model verification (distributional distance tests, membership inference risk scans, mode-collapse detection, DP-privacy assertions when applicable); (3) explainability validation (explanation fidelity metrics, consistency and stability tests across local and global explainers, counterfactual plausibility checks using generative manifold constraints); (4) safety and security evaluation (adversarial query simulation, model inversion resistance tests, API rate-limit and authentication tests, threat analytics stress tests); (5) performance and latency tests for streaming architectures (end-to-end latency SLAs, backpressure resilience for Kafka/Flink-like pipelines); and (6) governance and compliance checks (automated model cards, audit trails, reproducible experiment artifacts). We detail test design patterns, synthetic and real-world test data strategies, and instrumentation required for in-situ validation. Experimental application of the framework to an enterprise-grade XGenAI credit-scoring and threat-detection stack (streaming ingestion, HANA-like in-memory serving, and model explainability services) shows that systematic testing reduces silent failures, prevents common privacy leaks during synthetic augmentation, and improves explanation stability under temporal drift. The framework integrates with CI/CD pipelines, enabling automated canary testing, staged rollout validation, and rollback triggers — thereby operationalizing safe deployment of explainable generative systems in critical financial contexts.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
1. Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer.
2. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press.
3. Muthusamy, M. (2024). Cloud-Native AI metrics model for real-time banking project monitoring with integrated safety and SAP quality assurance. International Journal of Research and Applied Innovations (IJRAI), 7(1), 10135–10144. https://doi.org/10.15662/IJRAI.2024.0701005
4. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 30).
5. Thangavelu, K., Keezhadath, A. A., & Selvaraj, A. (2022). AI-Powered Log Analysis for Proactive Threat Detection in Enterprise Networks. Essex Journal of AI Ethics and Responsible Innovation, 2, 33-66.
6. Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). "Why should I trust you?": Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 1135–1144).
7. Pasumarthi, A. (2023). Dynamic Repurpose Architecture for SAP Hana Transforming DR Systems into Active Quality Environments without Compromising Resilience. International Journal of Engineering & Extended Technologies Research (IJEETR), 5(2), 6263-6274.
8. Kesavan, E., Srinivasulu, S., & Deepak, N. M. (2025, July). Cloud Computing for Internet of Things (IoT): Opportunities and Challenges. In 2025 2nd International Conference on Computing and Data Science (ICCDS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
9. Kusumba, S. (2025). Modernizing US Healthcare Financial Systems: A Unified HIGLAS Data Lakehouse for National Efficiency and Accountability. International Journal of Computing and Engineering, 7(12), 24-37.
10. Peram, S. (2024). Cost Optimization in AI Systems Leveraging DEMATEL for Machine Learning and Cloud Efficiency. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sudhakara-Peram/publication/396293333_Cost_Optimization_in_AI_Systems_Leveraging_DEMATEL_for_Machine_Learning_and_Cloud_Efficiency/links/68e5f179f3032e2b4be76f3f/Cost-Optimization-in-AI-Systems-Leveraging-DEMATEL-for-Machine-Learning-and-Cloud-Efficiency.pdf
11. Ramakrishna, S. (2022). AI-augmented cloud performance metrics with integrated caching and transaction analytics for superior project monitoring and quality assurance. International Journal of Engineering & Extended Technologies Research (IJEETR), 4(6), 5647–5655. https://doi.org/10.15662/IJEETR.2022.0406005
12. Kumar, S. N. P. (2025). Regulating Autonomous AI Agents: Prospects, Hazards, and Policy Structures. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 7(10), 393-399.
13. Konatham, M. R., Uddandarao, D. P., Vadlamani, R. K., & Konatham, S. K. R. (2025, July). Federated Learning for Credit Risk Assessment in Distributed Financial Systems using BayesShield with Homomorphic Encryption. In 2025 International Conference on Computing Technologies & Data Communication (ICCTDC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
14. Tamizharasi, S., Rubini, P., Saravana Kumar, S., & Arockiam, D. Adapting federated learning-based AI models to dynamic cyberthreats in pervasive IoT environments.
15. Joseph, J. (2023). Trust, but Verify: Audit-ready logging for clinical AI. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/JimmyJoseph9/publication/395305525_Trust_but_Verify_Audit -ready_logging_for_clinical_AI/links/68bbc5046f87c42f3b9011db/Trust-but-Verify-Audit-readylogging-for-clinical-AI.pdf
16. Christadoss, J., Devi, C., & Mohammed, A. S. (2024). Event-Driven Test-Environment Provisioning with Kubernetes Operators and Argo CD. American Journal of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Innovations, 4, 229-263.
17. A. K. S, L. Anand and A. Kannur, "A Novel Approach to Feature Extraction in MI - Based BCI Systems," 2024 8th International Conference on Computational System and Information Technology for Sustainable Solutions (CSITSS), Bengaluru, India, 2024, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/CSITSS64042.2024.10816913.
18. Kandula, N. (2023). Evaluating Social Media Platforms A Comprehensive Analysis of Their Influence on Travel Decision-Making. J Comp Sci Appl Inform Technol, 8(2), 1-9.Pasumarthi, A., & Joyce, S. SABRIX FOR SAP: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ITS FEATURES AND BENEFITS. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395447894_International_Journal_of_Engineering_Technology_Research_Management_SABRIX_FOR_SAP_A_COMPARATIVE_ANALYSIS_OF_ITS_FEATURES_AND_BENEFITS
19. Künzel, S. R., Sekhon, J. S., Bickel, P. J., & Yu, B. (2019). Metalearners for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects using machine learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(10), 4156–4165.
20. Mohile, A. (2023). Next-Generation Firewalls: A Performance-Driven Approach to Contextual Threat Prevention. International Journal of Computer Technology and Electronics Communication, 6(1), 6339-6346.
21. Kotapati, V. B. R., Pachyappan, R., & Mani, K. (2021). Optimizing Serverless Deployment Pipelines with Azure DevOps and GitHub: A Model-Driven Approach. Newark Journal of Human-Centric AI and Robotics Interaction, 1, 71-107.
22. Adari, V. K. (2024). APIs and open banking: Driving interoperability in the financial sector. International Journal of Research in Computer Applications and Information Technology (IJRCAIT), 7(2), 2015–2024.
23. Vasugi, T. (2023). AI-empowered neural security framework for protected financial transactions in distributed cloud banking ecosystems. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science & Technology, 6(2), 7941–7950. https://doi.org/0.15662/IJARCST.2023.0602004
24. Nagarajan, G. (2022). Optimizing project resource allocation through a caching-enhanced cloud AI decision support system. International Journal of Computer Technology and Electronics Communication, 5(2), 4812–4820. https://doi.org/10.15680/IJCTECE.2022.0502003
25. Kumar, R. K. (2022). AI-driven secure cloud workspaces for strengthening coordination and safety compliance in distributed project teams. International Journal of Research and Applied Innovations (IJRAI), 5(6), 8075–8084. https://doi.org/10.15662/IJRAI.2022.0506017
26. Sculley, D., et al. (2015). Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 2503–2511).
27. Amershi, S., et al. (2019). Software engineering for machine learning: A case study. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE).