Integrating Interpretability and Cloud Intelligence in Oracle EBS: A Framework for Secure, Privacy-Aware Machine Learning in Software Ecosystems
Main Article Content
Abstract
Industrial control and enterprise application domains are converging: modern facilities increasingly coordinate on-cloud enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems such as Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS) with edge controllers that manage power electronics (e.g., DC–DC converters) for data centers, medical devices, and critical infrastructure. This paper proposes a software-ecosystem framework that unifies interpretable machine learning, cloud intelligence, and privacy-aware data engineering to enable secure, auditable control of DC–DC converters while preserving enterprise governance and user privacy. The framework integrates (1) non-invasive EBS telemetry and asset/inventory metadata to inform control policies and maintenance schedules; (2) edge telemetry and control hooks for DC–DC converters with secure communication channels and fail-safe defaults; (3) privacy-preserving ML (federated learning, differential privacy, and encrypted inference) to train predictive maintenance and control models without centralizing sensitive operational or patient-related data; and (4) interpretability layers (rule-extraction, local explanations, model cards) so SecOps, engineers, and auditors can understand recommendations and synthesized control adjustments.
Architecturally, the system is microservice-based: data ingestion and normalization, a versioned model registry supporting encrypted model artifacts, an explainability service that exposes human-friendly rationales, and a policy-as-code enforcement plane that translates business and safety constraints into verifiable rules for both cloud and edge. Safety is emphasized through conservative control envelopes, human-in-the-loop approval for any closed-loop actuation, and layered redundancy (edge fallback controllers, immutable audit logs, and staged rollback). We evaluate the framework via (a) retrospective replay and synthetic fault injection on anonymized EBS and converter telemetry, (b) privacy and attack-surface analyses for encrypted and federated workflows, and (c) a shadow-mode pilot linking EBS maintenance workflows to edge control suggestions.
Results indicate that privacy-preserving training achieves near-centralized performance on predictive tasks with substantially reduced data movement; interpretable outputs materially improve operator trust and decrease mean time to remediate (MTTR) in simulated incidents; and policy-as-code enforcement prevents unsafe automated actuation. We discuss trade-offs (latency for encrypted inference, governance complexity, and lifecycle of model interpretability artifacts) and provide a practical roadmap for staged adoption in regulated environments.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
1. Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., & Mané, D. (2016). Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565.
2. AZMI, S. K. (2021). Markov Decision Processes with Formal Verification: Mathematical Guarantees for Safe Reinforcement Learning
3. Sugumar, R. (2022). Estimation of Social Distance for COVID19 Prevention using K-Nearest Neighbor Algorithm through deep learning. IEEE 2 (2):1-6.
4. Sangannagari, S. R. (2022). THE FUTURE OF AUTOMOTIVE INNOVATION: EXPLORING THE IN-VEHICLE SOFTWARE ECOSYSTEM AND DIGITAL VEHICLE PLATFORMS. International Journal of Research and Applied Innovations, 5(4), 7355-7367.
5. Kumbum, P. K., Adari, V. K., Chunduru, V. K., Gonepally, S., & Amuda, K. K. (2020). Artificial intelligence using TOPSIS method. International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering, Technology and Management (IJRPETM), 3(6), 4305-4311.
6. Bünz, B., Fisch, B., & Günther, C. (2020). Privacy-preserving machine learning: a survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 53(6), Article 134.
7. Kiran Nittur, Srinivas Chippagiri, Mikhail Zhidko, “Evolving Web Application Development Frameworks: A Survey of Ruby on Rails, Python, and Cloud-Based Architectures”, International Journal of New Media Studies (IJNMS), 7 (1), 28-34, 2020.
8. Carlton, D., & Patterson, R. (2018). Integrating ERP systems with operational control: patterns and practices. Journal of Enterprise Integration, 12(3), 201–218.
9. Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608.
10. Shaffi, S. M. (2022). Enterprise Content Management and Data Governance Policies and Procedures Manual. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 11(8), 1570–1576. https://doi.org/10.21275/sr220811091304
11. Eisenhardt, K., & Brown, M. (2020). Policy-as-code for enterprise governance: design patterns and case studies. IEEE Software, 37(5), 44–52.
12. Balaji, K. V., & Sugumar, R. (2022, December). A Comprehensive Review of Diabetes Mellitus Exposure and Prediction using Deep Learning Techniques. In 2022 International Conference on Data Science, Agents & Artificial Intelligence (ICDSAAI) (Vol. 1, pp. 1-6). IEEE.
13. Feng, X., Li, Y., & Chen, Z. (2021). Data-driven predictive maintenance for power electronics: a review. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(8), 5623–5636.
14. Sangannagari, S. R. (2021). Modernizing mortgage loan servicing: A study of Capital One’s divestiture to Rushmore. International Journal of Research and Applied Innovations, 4(4), 5520-5532.
15. Hinton, G., & Sancheti, B. (2019). Model cards and documentation for accountable ML. Proceedings of the Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency Conference (FAT).
16. IEC. (2018). IEC 62443: Industrial communication networks — Network and system security. International Electrotechnical Commission.
17. Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., ... & Zhao, S. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210.
18. Lécuyer, M., Papernot, N., Song, S., Oprea, A., & Shmatikov, V. (2019). Certified robustness to adversarial examples with differential privacy. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.
19. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS).
20. Gosangi, S. R. (2022). SECURITY BY DESIGN: BUILDING A COMPLIANCE-READY ORACLE EBS IDENTITY ECOSYSTEM WITH FEDERATED ACCESS AND ROLE-BASED CONTROLS. International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering, Technology and Management (IJRPETM), 5(3), 6802-6807.
21. O’Dwyer, P., & Connolly, S. (2020). Secure control of power-electronic converters: approaches and challenges. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 35(2), 1216–1228.
22. Amuda, K. K., Kumbum, P. K., Adari, V. K., Chunduru, V. K., & Gonepally, S. (2020). Applying design methodology to software development using WPM method. Journal ofComputer Science Applications and Information Technology, 5(1), 1-8.
23. G Jaikrishna, Sugumar Rajendran, Cost-effective privacy preserving of intermediate data using group search optimisation algorithm, International Journal of Business Information Systems, Volume 35, Issue 2, September 2020, pp.132-151.
24. Shokri, R., & Shmatikov, V. (2015). Privacy-preserving deep learning. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS).